To evaluate the program in the case study, a summative evaluation should be chosen. This program was a 2-year pilot program, and so it is important to evaluate if it was successful and met its goals, in order to decide to continue its funding, alter the program, or have it discontinued.
There are many reasons why a summative evaluation would be the best choice. When applying Bertrand’s chart to the program, many of the fields relating to the summative evaluation fit. The goal of the program is specifically to use exercise as the primary preventative strategy for high risk populations of type two diabetes, and therefore measures both a change in behaviour and health status. Since this program lasted for two years, there should be a large amount of data available for the initial, intermediate, and long-term effects it had on the participants. Gathering the data should not be difficult because of the welcoming environment the program created. It would be important to find out from the participants what effect the program had on their health, and the health of their children, who would be approximately 15-16 years of age if this evaluation was carried out today.
Lastly, an impact assessment can be carried out by analyzing all the data collected from the program participants deciding if the goals of the program were reached. After careful analysis, of whether or not the goal of preventing type two diabetes was successful, a decision can be made on the continuation, reinstatement, or cutting of this program at the YMCA.
Lastly, an impact assessment can be carried out by analyzing all the data collected from the program participants deciding if the goals of the program were reached. After careful analysis, of whether or not the goal of preventing type two diabetes was successful, a decision can be made on the continuation, reinstatement, or cutting of this program at the YMCA.
David I agree that a summative model will provide a useful amount of data about the program. I suggest expanding the data gathered to include interviews and possibly focus groups rather than relying solely on the existing data. If your plan needs to look at the long term impacts of the program studying the children would be beneficial. I also agree that if the participants felt welcome during the program that they would also feel inclined to share their experiences.
ReplyDeleteJay